{"id":58,"date":"2023-09-13T13:34:35","date_gmt":"2023-09-13T17:34:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.citadel.edu\/plagiarism\/?page_id=58"},"modified":"2023-09-13T13:34:36","modified_gmt":"2023-09-13T17:34:36","slug":"integrating","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.citadel.edu\/plagiarism\/sources\/integrating\/","title":{"rendered":"Integrating"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Tips for Integrating Sources<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Adapted from Duquesne University Writing Center<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Follow three steps.<\/strong>1. Introduce2. Provide and cite3. Analyze<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example:<\/strong> Derek Ross compares the development of Monopoly through multiple iterations from multiple designers to the development of a Wikipedia article. He writes, \u201cMonopoly was like a Wikipedia [sic<\/em>] article. Maggie made the first few versions, then other people tweaked it over 30 years. So the name and the design both changed as time went by. It\u2019s still basically the same game though. Very much like a Wikipedia article really\u201d (n. pg.).\u00a0Though other texts may not be \u201cbasically the same\u201d after such revision, Ross\u2019s comments show that attention to the workings of Wikipedia can help authors understand the iterative nature of other texts.

<\/em>The tips below address each of these steps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n


\n\n\n\n

1. Introduce<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Use signal phrases.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n